They’ve become the epitome of sackless-eunuch-hipster journalism, spreaders of fake-news, cultural-marxism, radical feminism and cancerous identity politics.
Vice buried most of this two hour interview with hero of logic and truth, Professor Jordan Peterson, choosing to share only twenty minutes, and out of context. But random bits are appearing on Youtube.
In the below clip, the Vice manlet brings up the subject of sexual assault on college campuses. The clip begins with Vice addressing the hysteria. Though the journalist isn’t interested in JP’s opinion, as much as ousting him as a rape apologist.
Of course, JP tools him with logic, rationality and nuance.
Why do I care about this subject? Because what happens in University, spreads throughout society. I’m sick of the anti-male narrative. It divides men and women, and keeps us miserable, distrustful, and loveless.
The reason these “journalists” fail to comprehend wisemen like Jordan Peterson, is because, well…they aren’t men.
They’re soft; physically, intellectually, and spiritually. They have no clue about the reality of modern sexuality–they don’t have sex!
As I’ve said before, I completely disavow any form of sexual assault, or date rape. I regularly advise men not to sleep with intoxicated women. I know, I know, it’s hard when you have some beauty grinding herself on you, and more than willing to go home with you. But it’s just not worth it.
If you find yourself accused of sexual misconduct, guilty or not, you will be tried by the court of social media, and it will cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars, at least. And your public reputation.
That’s why we need more than ever, for this conversation to happen. But since the MSM is incapable, it’s up to us little folk to sort it all out.
I’ve transcribed the highlights below with my own comments in brackets.
JP: “Yeah, but what’s the problem with sexual assault on campuses? We can’t even have an intelligent discussion about that. (He means with the mainstream media.)
Vice: Well I think that, perhaps the problem would be that women get raped quite a bit in colleges. (Says whom exactly? The MSM. There is no evidence supporting this.)
JP: The problem is that sexual behaviour in young people is complex and dis-regulated and often fuelled by alcohol. And so all sorts of things happen that people don’t like, and we have no idea what to do about it, so we’re setting up a parallel judicial system to deal with it in a matter that’s going to make it far worse. (Universities are setting up their own court systems to deal with sexual assault accusations, rather than relying on the traditional law system. These systems are biased, as most are staffed by social justice warriors, man loathing feminists, and far left ideologues.)
Vice: How does it make it worse though?
JP: How about unwarranted accusations? (False rape accusations are becoming common place and life destroying, especially via social media lynch mobs.)
Vice: Why is the collateral damage the only thing you seem to focus on? (Meaning men being destroyed by false accusations. He doesn’t see a problem here.)
JP: The collateral damage won’t end. We’re transforming the universities into quasi-judicial enterprises. They don’t have the expertise for it. (Says this only leads to witch hunts.) We’re not addressing the issue. One of the issues is that people get drunk on college campuses, drunk people do stupid things. Fifty percent of people who are killed are drunk. Fifty percent of people who do the murdering are drunk. The same thing happens with unfortunate sexual encounters. Then you ask yourself well why do people drink?
Vice: I don’t think we need to go there… (Because women are not responsible for their actions.)
JP: Well we do because that’s a huge part of what’s contributing to the problem.
Vice: Would you just mandate an end to alcohol on college campuses?
Vice: Would you think that’s a better solution because that seems Maoist itself. (JP just said we need to talk about these things. He didn’t say there should be a mandated system of control. This is the manlet trying to frame JP as an evil hetero white supremacist Nazi.)
JP: I would at least say that that starts to address the actual problem. We’re not trying to address the problem we’re operating sequential witch hunts to make the prosecutors of the witch hunts feel like they’re moral. We’re not solving the problem, we’re not addressing the issue, we’re not having an adult conversation about this. The adult conversation would be “How should young people regulate their sexual behaviour?” Well, you know, there’s a start. It’s like, do you have sex on the first date?
Vice: Do you really think that conversation is never happening?
JP: I don’t think it’s happened properly. No I don’t think it’s happened properly since the invention of the birth control pill.
Vice: I think everyone in this room went to some form of sexual education.
JP: Well what did you learn?
Vice: To not get STD’s.
JP: Yeah, yeah well sure, that’s what you learn. How about how many dates should you go on before you have sex?
Vice: Well look, I mean, I don’t know… (Exactly JP’s point.)
JP: Right! Neither does anyone else.
Vice: Do you have an answer?
JP: How about not one?
Vice: Not one.
JP: Yeah. One is the wrong number. We could start with that.
Vice: I fail to see the connection between that and the sexual assault issue on campuses (because he never had sex in college?) Do you really feel like if you mandated right, or if you suggested as a clinician, “Wait till date four.” That the sexual assault issue on campuses would be changed?
JP: I would say well wait till date four and try not to drink much in the first three. That’d be a start. It’s like you don’t want to get yourself in trouble. I mean I counsel women all the time about how not to get themselves in trouble. Men as well, how to regulate their behaviour properly. It’s like, there’s all sorts of things that you shouldn’t do.
This Vice interviewer is an idiot
The conversation moves onto the question, where should a first date take place? JP says the safest option is a coffee shop, in the daytime, where it’s safe. He suggests perhaps the woman starts with a phone call, to see if the guy she’s meeting is sane. Then meet up again, sequentially, with caution.
Vice: “It seems like a very dark vision of the world.”
JP: It is a very dark vision of the world.
I’ve spent far too many years chasing women in bars. And I’ll tell you, sex is not hard to find. You don’t need to manipulate women, or use hypnotic commands. You just need a little courage, problem solving skills, and promises of cranberry vodka back at your place. There are loads of young women more than willing to go home and bang a guy they just met. Don’t believe me? just watch this documentary about college kids during spring break.
The MSM is manufacturing a hysteria that claims predatory men are solely responsible for this manufactured #metoo #timesup “crisis.”
The truth is, women are just as responsible for their safety. The media can scream hysterically about rape culture, they can hashtag mob the accused, but it won’t solve anything.
As Professor Peterson says, we can’t even have an intelligent discussion about this yet.
What can you do? Well besides not sleeping with drunk women, keep the social media and text messages, take selfies of her kissing your cheek…anything to prove consent.
Personally, I won’t date women who look like this: Blue or pink hair, face piercing and lots of tattoos, horn rimmed glasses, combat clothing, etc. Not because I think it looks awful, but because it broadcasts political ideology, which is likely radical. Maybe she’s not radical, but why risk a false rape allegation because she read a Jezebel or Vice article that fired her up? Screen her politics first, at least. Subtly.
And in reality, most normal women enjoy hooking up with attractive, fun, confident men. Don’t live with fear in your heart. But at the same time, use common sense.